The Fur-Free Friday
A historical perspective by Cres Vellucci, one of the founders of this event.

"Fur-Free Friday" was created in 1986 by Trans Species Unlimited (TSU), based in Pennsylvania with West Coast offices in California, as a way to focus on department stores' decision to sell fur.

Prior to Fur-Free Friday, there were sporadic fur protests in the early and mid-1980s.  However, activists with TSU felt there needed to be some kind of coordinated action to increase the intensity of protest against the cruelties of the fur industry.  TSU also wanted activity that was more dramatic than passing out flyers.

In creating Fur-Free Friday, the intent was to provide grassroots activists all over the U.S. the opportunity to participate in a coordinated direct action against department stores.  The focus was also placed on acts of nonviolent civil disobedience at these stores, similar to the lunch counter sit-ins and other civil rights actions.

In 1985, in a prelude to this organized event, two groups of activists -- one in the New York Macy's and another in the Sacramento Macy's - did the first-ever coordinated, non-violent civil disobedience activity protesting fur in the U.S.  The arrests totaled several dozen. The following year, the dedicated anti-fur activists hit stores on what is widely known as the busiest shopping day of the year, the day after Thanksgiving. 

Since then the day after Thanksgiving has become known in the movement as Fur-Free Friday.

At its height of popularity among activists, Fur-Free Friday involves dozens of grassroots groups in more than 30 states, all engaged in non-violent protests that result in hundreds of arrests.  Meanwhile, as Fur-Free Friday grew, fur sales slumped.  In the 1980s, fur sales topped more than $2 billion a year and, likely due to protests such as Fur-Free Friday, have dwindled to about half that currently.

By the early and mid-1990s, Fur-Free Friday had been recognized in the animal movement as being one of the most widely attended U.S. protests against animal suffering.  Nationally recognized organizations such as In Defense of Animals (IDA) have been significant promoters of the movement-wide event by providing anti-fur posters and informational literature.

In 1997, Fur-Free Friday saw a range of activities, including non-violent civil disobedience.  More than 100 dedicated activists were arrested while making their statements of protest against fur.  Fur-Free Friday is one of the few nationally recognized days in the animal movement with "ownership" belonging to grassroots activists determined to halt the cruel fur industry and retailers of its products.

Cres Vellucci can be contacted via email at: civillib@cwnet.com, or website www.FurFreeFriday.com.

The Fur Facts: Trapping

 

The Fur Facts: Farming

 

The Fur Facts: U.S. Trade Economy

Source: Coalition to Abolish the Fur Trade (CAFT) Website http://www.banfur.com Email: CAFT13@aol.com

"FUR FARMS FACE SHUTDOWN OVER NEXT THREE YEARS IN U.K."
By John Deane, Chief Political Correspondent, PA News

Source: Radio 4's Today programme; owner-ar-news@envirolink.org; on behalf of; CAFT13@aol.com

The British Government was today publishing a Bill which will ban fur farming by the end of 2002. The UK's remaining 13 fur farms, all in England, currently slaughter around 100,000 mink for fur each year.  Farmers will receive compensation, although the amount has yet to be decided.  Today Agriculture Minister Elliot Morley explained why the Government was so determined to press ahead with the Bill, unveiled in last week's Queen's Speech. "We did give an undertaking that we would phase out fur farming, and indeed although there's only mink farming at the present time, it's still legal to farm other animals like Arctic fox ... so I think it is important that we do take a decision to end fur farming in this country," said Mr. Morley. "If we don't legislate, even if they all declined and eventually closed, in the future there would be nothing to stop another one opening." Compensation would be determined on a farm by farm basis, dependent on their size and assets, he said. Fur farming was particularly intensive. "It's an intensive method of farming with battery cages ... so it is a kind of farming that many people find unacceptable.  Many people find it morally unacceptable because it's just for fur, and you don't really have to farm animals for this reason," he told BBC.